Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottish Renewables


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.  Arbitrarily0  ( talk ) 11:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Scottish Renewables

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No refs on the page, not clear what sources could exist to show that a trade body was notable and met the standards of en.wiki JMWt (talk) 09:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 09:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business,  and Environment.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  11:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  05:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: There are sources which provide basic verification of this industry body, for example the text of the First Minister's speech at their conference (Scottish Govt 25/1/23), quotes and advocacy by the organisation's officials BBC 17/10/23, Insider 19/10/23. What I'd like to see, though, is assessment coverage about Scottish Renewables itself. AllyD (talk) 17:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.