Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottish running guide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Flowerparty ☀ 23:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Scottish running guide

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable publication. A bit of coverage on Facebook, Twitter, and Digg, but no reliable sources. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 21:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. A comment made by the creator on my talk page shows that he himself agrees he is unable to show that the publication meets our notability guidelines (which is not surprising, given the publication's nature). I pondered prodding the article, but this AfD came a bit sooner than I expected. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 03:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I was actually monitoring abuse filter 29 (for removing CSD tags). I wanted to PROD it, but figured that if they would remove a CSD tag, they probably would remove a PROD as well. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:11, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This appears to be a good faith article by someone who wasn't aware of the rules for notability. I've thought for some time that for non-autoconfirmed users, the process for creating a new article should make it clearer what the rules of notability are, rather than have their work deleted afterwards, which is demoralising for new users. However, concerning the article itself, it's a clear delete. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 07:43, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.