Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scrapmetal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 20:10, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Scrapmetal

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable unsourced (through reliable sources) fictional character, a merge to a minor characters list may be appropriate but none seems to exist. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:47, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination; there are not enough extant WP:RS on any of the Transformers characters we're seeing lately to create a list of minor characters, and thus, fails WP:FICT and WP:GNG. — Chromancer  talk/cont 02:29, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree. Even a list needs reliable sources, so this can't even really be merged. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is a case where it actually makes sense to delete. --Divebomb (talk) 14:17, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: Listing on AfD log for the first time (as far as I can tell) on 20 September. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 19:31, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Who the hell actually looks at this stuff lol... yeah this is worthless -- Talk ««« OisinisiO »»» Talk 19:51, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of notability and redirect to Scrap. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:59, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete- poor article should go. Dwanyewest (talk) 21:25, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List_of_Transformers:_Cybertron_characters as that's the place that talks about him. Mathewignash (talk) 23:41, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Scrap- another hopeless Transformers trivia article. Nothing even remotely resembling adequate sourcing, no real assertion of notability. Just a lot of trivial, indiscriminate scraps of pointless information. Reyk  YO!  01:54, 26 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.