Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scratte (fictional character)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete (G5) as a page created by a banned user  in violation of ban. –MuZemike 23:27, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Scratte (fictional character)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Cartoon character that appears in a single film. No indication of notability. Article appears to be little more than expansion of film plot as it concerns this character NtheP (talk) 22:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

What do you mean by no notability? I added several references and a screenshot of her, isn't that enough proof? --Hjfhksdjf (talk) 22:07, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * (Response to Question Above) Notability means the importance of the subject (Scratte) and whether it is important enough to included in this encyclopedia, not whether info can be found about the subject. Since she is not essential to the movie and only in one, she should just be mentioned int he movie article, she doesn't need her own. ~Qwerp Qwertus  |_Talk_| |_Contribs_| 23:24, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. None of the references appear to document any of the assertions within the article; essentially, a lot of hard work went into a great deal of original research into this minor character with, as per the nomination, no indication of notability.  There's nothing here that needs to be merged into the main body of the article for the film(s) in question, I suggest.  Accounting4Taste: talk 22:20, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete or merge into Ice Age character page, not notable enough for its own article. Also per AfC decline by me.  — fetch ·  comms   22:55, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge I think that it should be merged to List of Ice Age characters along with the image. --Hjfhksdjf (talk) 23:01, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge I agree - this should be merged with it's corresponding section in the Ice Age article - the character is not really essential to the series (and so not notable enough). ~Qwerp Qwertus  |_Talk_| |_Contribs_| 23:24, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Question: Is it going to be deleted then redirected to the requested link and is it going to include the image? --Hjfhksdjf (talk) 23:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect To Merge Place We should redirect it to its section on that page.~Qwerp Qwertus  |_Talk_| |_Contribs_| 23:46, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and note that if kept by some strange twist of consensus, this article should probably be at Scratte. Jclemens (talk) 00:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge any reliably sourced text to List of Ice Age characters. First Light (talk) 04:21, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Speedy delete as yet another creation of our usual pair of idiot Disney vandalizing socksUser:Alexcas11 -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 21:23, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.