Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scream 3: The Album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Scream 3: The Album

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article is over 5 years old and has had only a handful of edits in that time, lacks any sources or citations or contributes anything that isn't already on the Scream 3 page. Therefore I believe it to be superfluous to the project and it would seem obvious no one has any interest in contributing to it in any such way to change that.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 12:34, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * EDIT For clarification, I have not based htis nomination on the number of edits to the page, just remarking on the articles age tied with its apparently low interest or involvement that indicate it may stay in its current shape for the next 5 years. Though props to Tarc for making some improvements.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:15, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Spent 14 weeks on the Billboard 200, peaking at 32. Meets WP:NALBUM criteria. Tarc (talk) 13:35, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I take your point but like I said, everything that is in this article is already in Scream 3 article.


 * Keep Per Tarc - passes WP:NALBUM. "The article is over 5 years old and has had only a handful of edits in that time" isn't a valid reason for deletion.  Lugnuts  (talk) 16:29, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - the nominator is correct that the article needs improvement and expansion. But sparse editing activity is not a reason for deletion; see WP:NOEFFORT. Also, quantity of edits has nothing to do with notability, which is the real issue to be tackled in deletion discussions. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 16:32, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Scre4m!Captain Marshalls (talk) 23:38, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Never thought I'd say this, but Keep per Tarc. Qrsdogg (talk) 12:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.