Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scream Tracker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 22:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Scream Tracker

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete. Fails GNG with a lack of non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 18:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 19:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or merge to tracker (music software). Salon (magazine) article and some 20 google books give this as one of the early and notable tracker software (together with Impulse Tracker, which has been deleted and userified despite having 14 gbooks hits), but despite widespread mention, there's not much to be said about individual incarnations of this type of software. So, we'd either have to agree that many book mentions make it notable enough for an article, or merge all such software that gets sufficient mentions in the article that describes their kind. Pcap ping  19:37, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  20:01, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Pcap. LotLE × talk  03:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Pcap. bbx (talk) 04:06, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Watch this youtube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4mJ58VtPFw ¨¨ victor   falk  10:14, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That is a nice song to listen to victor, but how is it relevant in terms of WP:N ...? I am guessing there are probably a multitude of examples you could show for any software application being used on YouTube so I am wondering what the importance is here.   JBsupreme  ( talk ) 21:22, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.