Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screaming Pattersons (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Screaming Pattersons (band)
Band does not meet notability requirements in WP:MUSIC. Prod tag was contested.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MUSIC, WP:VAIN, and WP:NPOV. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 01:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

I believe this band meets the Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city (or both, as in British hip hop); note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability requirement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by W9843 (talk • contribs)
 * Above user's edits all have been vanity entries. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 01:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. Vanity perhaps, but it seems that this band has made considerable contribution to the community and that a good deal of people (other than the community) would be able to recognize them on a search. — Preceding unsigned comment added by W9843 (talk • contribs)

I agree with the above commentator. I live in New York, and I have heard of this band before. They are well worthy of a wikipeida page. —This unsigned comment was added by User3344 (talk • contribs).

This may be true but this may be their attempt to write a first article and may publish several others after this. But as we continue to debate its deletion, their confidence to write an article is slowly decreasing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.151.39.31 (talk • contribs)


 * Delete. Winning "local competition" is not notable. Batmanand | Talk 01:21, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. They have "become the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city". —This unsigned comment was added by 146.151.39.31 (talk • contribs).


 * Comment Thus far, all of the keep votes have been from user's whose only contributions have been to the aforementioned article or debate.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:30, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; fails WP:MUSIC. -- Kinu t /c  02:52, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete nn. --Khoikhoi 03:18, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -- Ned Scott 03:49, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as not important enough to include in an encyclopedia. Brian G. Crawford, the so-called &quot;Nancy Grace of AfD&quot; 04:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - poorly written article about non-notable music group.  dbtfz talk 04:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:MUSIC. To those voting keep, please read WP:MUSIC and if possible, explain to us how it meets the requirements there. JoshuaZ 05:26, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Arbusto 06:36, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Clear delete per nom. Joe 06:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. &rArr;    SWAT Jester   [[Image:Flag_of_Iceland.svg|18px|]]  Ready    Aim    Fire!  07:27, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC,WP:VAIN.-- Dakota ~  °  08:20, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, as per nomination. --Soumyasch 08:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity band. --Ter e nce Ong 09:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, VanityBandCruft.  Dei z io  17:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Jay  (Reply)  22:12, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 00:13, 26 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.