Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screenfetch (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article moved to /dev/null -- RoySmith (talk) 12:54, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Screenfetch
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Product (generally viewed as needing to meet NCORP) fails to satisfy notability. There are sources available, as was noted in previous AfD, but fail to meet WP:RELIABLE and/or WP:INDEPENDENT Nosebagbear (talk) 18:35, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:35, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rollidan (talk) 22:10, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Not wp:notable There are hundreds if not thousands of little scripting tools like this for Linux, Unix, and other operating systems. A few are notable (just barely) but the vast majority are not. This is clearly not. There are no reliable sources in the article and I did a Google search and all I found were refs in Linux manuals, tutorials, etc. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 13:36, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There is a Forbes Senior Contributor Jason Evangelho article where he says that Screenfetch is "one of his favorite command line apps". There is also an article on Fossbytes with a significant coverage of the tool which states that it is "one of the best Linux utilities that can be used to display cool system information on your terminal". --Gprscrippers (talk) 17:03, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Forbes "contributors" are not reliable. czar  03:09, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I'd spotted that review but, like Czar, decided that as it was a contributor (senior or otherwise) wasn't reliable - I've seen them rejected before in AfD. Nosebagbear (talk) 08:46, 5 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination and MadScientistX11's reasoning above. -The Gnome (talk) 10:18, 5 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.