Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screenology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clpo13(talk) 20:26, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Screenology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Google search comes up with about 100 results, none of which discuss the company in significant detail. ... disco spinster   talk  18:25, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 20:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Pretty blatant promotional WP:CORPSPAM. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:48, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:TOOSOON—I'd prefer not to disparage the author or the topic. Let's say that it's just too soon to have an article; the firm has not been in business sufficiently long to do anything which would support it's WP:NOTE. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 02:50, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, lack of significant reliable, verifiable, independent sources points to Ceyockey's assessment of WP:TOOSOON. Cabayi (talk) 07:20, 23 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.