Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ScrewAttack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Afd is not for suggesting article improvement. Such discussion should take place on Talk:ScrewAttack, with a cross-post to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games if you feel it needs wider attention. GarrettTalk 20:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

ScrewAttack
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article has been neglected to be formatted in a Wikipedia-appropriate style. Article is too long and does not follow the correct format. You can use the IGN, GameTrailers, or GameSpot articles as examples as to how this article should be changed. Doshindude (talk) 16:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep and Close What you're asking for is cleanup. AFD is not cleanup. This is not the proper venue for such a request. Place a cleanup tag on the article or fix it yourself. SashaNein (talk) 18:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 19:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Nom gives no reason for nomination other than cleanup reasons and AfD is not for cleanup. Be bold and fix this yourself.  Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 19:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as an utterly vexatious nomination. No valid reason listed in the deletion policy is listed. Remember that this is Articles for deletion, not Articles for discussion. MuZemike  ( talk ) 20:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.