Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ScriptDash Pharmacy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:45, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

ScriptDash Pharmacy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

subject fails WP:GNG. Only press release from primary sources could be found about the subject which makes me suspect a publicity stunt —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:28, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Unambiguously promotional - right down to the $20 gift card offer. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * How is this Nigeria-related? Exemplo347 (talk) 21:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * sorry about that. Corrected. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:35, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:31, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Apologies, I'm not familiar with articles for deletion discussion formatting. I've removed two references (expansion & charity) to address concerns about WP:PROMO. Thank you flagging this. To Oluwa2Chainz's comment, there are two sources that are not press releases: San Francisco Chronicle, and StanfordHealth.org. Looking forward to your feedback. (from Tapestry415) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tapestry415 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: To discuss changes to the article that removed some promotional material
 * Delete Per WP:PROMO Comatmebro  User talk:Comatmebro 21:49, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note I'm sticking with my !vote. The GNG isn't met by this company. Exemplo347 (talk) 23:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.