Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scriptishish's Shadow Debute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  23:38, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Scriptishish's Shadow Debute
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non encyclopedic content. Ctempleton3 (talk) 06:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MADEUP and WP:NOR. Vivio Testa rossa   Talk Who 06:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Wikipedia is not for something made up in school one day. - =Elfin= - 341 06:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per WP: MADEUP Alchemy12 (talk) 08:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:HOWTO. This is something for StrategyWiki. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 13:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD A1. Percy Snoodle (talk) 16:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. What a mess of an article...  ~EdGl  21:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Hard to see how any of this is notable enough to belong in an encyclopedia. Qworty (talk) 00:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - sorry, kiddo. Bearian (talk) 00:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete and I recommend someone talk to Scriptishish about creating articles like this. Pretty clear violation of WP:MADEUP and WP:HOWTO. Red Phoenix  (Talk) 01:57, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.