Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scrivito


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Scrivito

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD removed with absolutely no explanations thus I still confirm it. SwisterTwister  talk  22:29, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:30, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:30, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Obvious WP:NOTPROMO violation is obvious. No independent sources proffered, none found.  Nha Trang  Allons! 16:28, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sum total of the article is "this is a company".  Nothing even claimed regarding notability.  There is an admitted COI by the author, and we appreciate the honesty, but you need to become more familiar with policy or use the WP:AFC system so you can get guidance.  Farmer Brown (talk) 22:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Infopark where it's already mentioned. I'm not finding any sources on the product; but the company may be a target article. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * A quick glance at that article says it is ripe for AFD itself, so I wouldn't agree with a redirect. For instance, the large list of "customers", something that is normally not allowed, is being used in an attempt to inherit notability. I may send that one myself. Farmer Brown (talk) 17:33, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.