Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scroll.in


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Meager consensus is delete. Added sources that mention the site, or cite it briefly, do not add up to significant discussion. Drmies (talk) 15:09, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Scroll.in

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sparsely sourced article about a six month old company. The only useable source is a New York Times blog post by a freelance journalist from Bangalore. Fails WP:ORG. - MrX 11:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice to future recreation should the company survive and become better known. Fails web and company notability. Passing mentions to Scroll.in in the references, which are mainly focused on the 2014 India election rather than the company. I doubt if NY Times blogs have editorial oversight for fact checking etc. so reliability of that source is questionable. Nothing else substantial found through Google search. Philg88 ♦talk 13:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. - MrX 12:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. - MrX 12:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 12:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Additional sources that use/quote Scroll.in content/articles have been added to the wiki article. A few reference links to interview(s) with scroll.in journalists are also included. Various issues have been touched upon in these reference articles, that highlight the company's main focus of reportage - that being politics and culture of India. --DNeha (talk) 14:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 01:27, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 05:24, 29 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.