Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scrumpy Jack

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 02:48, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Scrumpy Jack
Spam. No NPV - not 'encyclopedic' Erwin Walsh
 * Delete . Not notable. Harro5 09:26, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Hmm? Fairly major brand of cider in the UK, and I think Scottish & Newcastle or their Bulmers subsidiary have better things to do than spam Wikipedia. The article as it stands is not encyclopedic in the slightest though, so I shall rewrite. Average Earthman 11:10, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * My delete vote referred to the absolutely rubbishy original version. Keep now. Harro5 22:53, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep after rewrite, notable brand. 213.78.100.139 11:19, 13 August 2005 (UTC) Pilatus 11:21, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Thank you very much for the very good re-write Average Earthman.
 * Keep, ty Average Earthman. Kappa 12:58, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I've heard of it. Good rewrite too, Average Earthman. --Celestianpower hab 13:14, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep; article rewritten to suitable standard. No worries.  Erwin Walsh
 * Keep; delete Walsh instead he is a loose cannon, this is one of many ignorant VFDs hee has posted. 
 * Keep Average Earthman's rewrite. Notable brand of cider. Capitalistroadster 14:51, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Average Earthman's rewrite. Fernando Rizo T/C 17:12, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Osomec 11:06, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep well known cider brand. Secretlondon 05:31, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.