Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scubaprobe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Daniel (talk) 08:34, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Scubaprobe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advertisement for a non-notable microscopy product. Kolbasz (talk) 14:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete It's not an advertisement it's a technique. Sounds interesting but totally unsourced. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:52, 18 December 2013 (UTC).
 * The few search results you get on it suggest that it's the name of a product, not a technique. And the article even has wording like "our devices are compatible with all existing commercial instruments" (emphasis added). Kolbasz (talk) 22:04, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * To anybody with a knowledge of the subject the technique is interesting. But the article is still unsourced. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:10, 18 December 2013 (UTC).


 * Delete per WP:NOTADVERTISING. The current article wording also strongly suggests a copyvio. There might be a case for an article on the technique, if it proves notable, but it would have a different title and reuse very little of the existing content, which is all about the product. -- 101.119.14.157 (talk) 01:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.