Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scv purge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 14:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Scv purge

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD as WP:NOTNEWS, tag removed by IP without rationale. Cannot see that this will be an event of lasting significance TheLongTone (talk) 14:14, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 19 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. The nomination might be right in the end, but it's fair to note that this particular episode is getting a lot of attention right now: a typical news article is  "Nude photos apparently of Santa Clarita Valley teens land on Twitter", Los Angeles Times, July 17, 2014.  There are dozens like this.  While NOTNEWS will probably counsel against a standalone article here, it's possible that some of this content might belong in another article (sexting?) --Arxiloxos (talk) 14:57, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Local crime story with local breaking news coverage. No evidence of passing WP:EVENT. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is too poorly WP:V sourced to consider anything but delete.  Unscintillating (talk) 19:11, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a newspaper. WP:NOTNEWS. If later on this gets lots of coverage the article can be recreated with better writing. Even in that case, it is now WP:TOOSOON. --Jersey92 (talk) 02:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per above; I am also very concerned that this will become a WP:BLP violation. Bearian (talk) 19:16, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Kill it with fire. A story about somebody Twitter-posting photos of nude minors? Are we encouraging child pornography now, or what? No reliable sources are cited in the article, and the occasional news coverage pointed to above fails WP:NOTNEWS. The sooner we get rid of this the better. --MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.