Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seacoast Shores


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. Notable within its region, but does not establish sufficient notability for a stand-alone. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Seacoast Shores

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod, so here we are. Unremarkable housing development too small/minor to be known to GNIS, Mapquest, or USPS as a 'populated place'. Most Ghits are real estate listings and/or addresses on Seacoast Shores Blvd--nothing indicating it is commonly/generally considered a "neighborhood". Shawisland (talk) 02:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Michael WhiteT&middot;C 02:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to East Falmouth, Massachusetts. Powers T 03:03, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge Per above. Five Years 11:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:02, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Not only is it a neighborhood, the Cape Cod Times calls it "one of Falmouth's most densely populated neighborhoods" and constantly refers to it as a "neighborhood" elsewhere, not a housing development.--Oakshade (talk) 17:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Neighborhoods aren't generally notable, either, though. Powers T 18:04, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * GNIS or Mapquest may not have it listed, but Realtor.com lists it as its own neighborhood, and the local Realtors association considers it its own neighborhood. I see that the argument here is neighborhoods should not be included on Wikipedia, but I believe that there is a Massachusetts expansion project going on, correct? So why delete it if it adds to the Massachusetts content on the site? Tgreve (talk) 21:46, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ahh, here it is. Wikiproject Massachusetts Tgreve (talk) 21:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not clear on where in WikiProject Massachusetts they indicate that articles on individual neighborhoods within towns are desirable. It's my impression that the current practice on Wikipedia is to include information on neighborhoods and hamlets in the article for the surrounding municipality (town/city/village), unless the neighborhood has exceptional notability on its own or the municipality's article is too large (such as Brentwood, Los Angeles, California).  Neither is the case here.  Powers T 15:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.