Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seahouses Festival


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Seahouses. Mgm|(talk) 11:19, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Seahouses Festival

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Created by a WP:SPA called "Seahousesfestival" (account renamed to Mmytik ), this article appears to fail WP:NOTE as it has not received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources independent of its subject. Cirt (talk) 14:19, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I understand that this page should contain factual verifiable information and that is what I am endeavouring to do. I do not want it to sound like a promo for this particular event but it is necessary that it should contain legitimate verifiable facts about the festival, as a useful addition to the 'festivals' subject area in general. I will present the information without hyperbole or unsubstantiated embellishment. The information on this page will hopefully feed into other subject areas which deal with Northumbrian culture. I would be grateful if you would not delete the page so hastily. Coverage in independent sources is available and can be added to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seahousesfestival (talk • contribs) 14:27, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Please take a moment to read WP:NOTE. Unfortunately the "Seahouses Festival" has not received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Cirt (talk) 14:36, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge after trimming to Seahouses. There is some local coverage as evidenced by this, and would be appropriate information to add to the town's article in a section covering culture or tourism. -- Whpq (talk) 17:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:00, 30 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge as suggested by Whpq. There are references for verifiability but they do not establish notability, being either non-independent, government, or specialized tourism sites.  I do not see evidence of significant non-trivial media coverage. Drawn Some (talk) 01:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge per above. Renaissancee (talk) 02:06, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.