Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean A. Wright


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Kurykh  03:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Sean A. Wright

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article was nominated for speedy deletion per A7, non-notability. There was a sufficient claim to notability in the article to avoid A7. I'm moving this to AFD for further discussion. Procedural listing, no opinion. A ecis Brievenbus 00:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: this article was created by, possibly the article's subject. A  ecis Brievenbus 00:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Whether the article was written by the article subject or not, it doesn't meet notability. It is also unreferenced and needs some serious cleanup. ― LADY GALAXY 00:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Doesn't come near to a pass of WP:PROF or WP:BIO. Would be a clear A7 if the author hadn't substituted "award" for "bursary".  Tevildo (talk) 00:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Same as all other comments.  Soxred93 | talk count bot 02:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, only mention of external notability seems to be that his marriage was featured in the nytimes & philly inquirer, which I don't think is relevant to his professional abilities. Lazulilasher (talk) 20:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, no references found supporting notability. -- Neil N   talk  ♦  contribs  23:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- Pete.Hurd (talk) 04:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. --Crusio (talk) 20:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Asserts published papers, though only a few, so not a speedy. A7 doesnt depend on the exact wording. Being on the society pages is probably not accepted here as notability, but that's an interesting qy.--the NYT is fairly selective. DGG (talk) 05:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete very minor interest. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC).
 * Delete - Doesn't qualify past WP:BIO. Scarian Call me Pat  16:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, appearing in the wedding pages isn't really a good indicator of notability. Lankiveil (complaints 02:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.