Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean D Reynolds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Sean D Reynolds

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to have issues per WP:AUTO and WP:BIO. Uncertain whether achievement listed here meets notability standards. Also being used as WP:SOAPBOX for personal beliefs. Appears largely self-promotional. Article's creator, editing once under own name and once anonymously, deleted speedy template. JNW (talk) 21:49, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom--Moloch09 (talk) 22:28, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

This is an auto biography, but the facts are documented and published. The requirements of WP:BIO are met as the achievement of getting a Helicopter to fly itself with an Arduino processor was deemed notable enough to be published by 3 independent sources. Seanreynoldscs (talk) 22:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

The page is by no means being used as WP:SOAPBOX. The opinions are those of the person being reference in the article. It is clearly stated by the author of the article that beliefs being referenced are those of the person being referenced. Furthermore it is not a soapbox to refer to something that is a widely accepted belief, it is merely one more person who believes that. This article is about Sean_D_Reynolds. He Believes what the article says he believes. He is Notable because of his published achievements, and his achievements are referenced by 3 independent credible sources. Seanreynoldscs (talk) 22:49, 20 March 2009 (UTC) — Seanreynoldscs (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete as per nom. Agree on notability and WP:SOAPBOX issues, as well as potential WP:COI. There have been numerous UAV implementations, being the world's first for a particular implementation is not notable itself.  Especially when I found implementations of the same thing from 9 months earlier  through a simple Google search.  Though one is a plane and the other a helicopter, it's not a distinctly new idea. Rurik (talk) 01:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.--CyberGhostface (talk) 23:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.