Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Frye


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 12:50, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Sean Frye

 * – ( View AfD View log )

BLP sourced only to IMDB. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Failes WP:ENT. Animusv3 (talk) 05:18, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 12:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment: I have found verifiability of his works in enough sources to convince me he meets WP:ENT and enough coverage in books and news to convince me he meets WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. WHen sources exist, being sourced only to IMDb is a reason to fix it if possible than it is to delete because it was not fixed by others. I'll be back after expanding and sourcing the article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Keep: A short career (not surprising for a child actor at that time), but he had significant roles in multiple notable films and television productions. Passes WP:NACTOR.--Cavarrone (talk) 08:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:14, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisting rationale: Article is a BLP. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:14, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Poor sourcing, per nomination, but seemingly enough acting credits to merit encyclopedic biography. Definitely not a slam dunk either way, but this looks like a Keep-and-Improve situation from a quick glance at the Google machine... Carrite (talk) 23:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NTEMP and WP:ENT.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.