Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Limbert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Sean Limbert

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Appears to fail the WP:ARTIST criteria. By definition all professional photographers have their photographs published, so finding his work in various publications is tangential. Similarly having profiles available (the one I checked seemed a self-written profile) is not the same thing as demonstrating significant impact or impact on the long term historic record. Searching Google News shows nothing more significant. As the article's history dates back to 2007, there seems little prospect of this improving in the near future. Fæ (talk) 13:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 13:06, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 13:07, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - When you're a photographer and Google Images returns one result of a guy with a different name, you're not notable, I have to assume. --YixilTesiphon TalkContribs 13:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ARTIST, though I disagree with the nominator on the point that "by definition all professional photographers have their photographs published", which tends not to be true for portrait photographers and such. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:25, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Good point, perhaps I should have said notable rather than professional though there are probably exceptions to that too. Fæ (talk) 18:39, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.