Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean M. Morrison


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lourdes  07:18, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Sean M. Morrison

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unsourced and résumé-formatted BLP of a person notable only for serving on a county council. As always, this is not a level of government that hands a person an automatic inclusion freebie just for existing as a county councillor -- it can sometimes get a person in the door if he can be reliably sourced well enough to demonstrate that he's special, but it's not one that entitles every councillor to post their résumé on here. Bearcat (talk) 01:57, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 01:58, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 01:58, 5 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN, WP:N and WP:GNG.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:21, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete article is sourced only to his own website.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:52, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * delete Nothing to show this county commissioner is any different than others, so fails WP:NPOL. Lacks the coverage required to meet the GNG.Sandals1 (talk) 18:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - a Google search finds a few items on his political career [] and this []. He also got a couple of endorsements, which in itself isn't that notable, since usually 50% of election candidates are endorsed: [] [] Some minor controversy here, but not really a reliable source: [] Nothing from his role as CEO of Morrison Security, which would be another avenue to pursue a notability argument. What tilted me to a delete versus a weak delete is that there's little coverage about him winning reelection - if he was notable, there would be more. This was it [] No indepth profiles that could seed biological info for an article. Fails WP:GNG. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  21:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.