Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean O'Neill (snooker player)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Sean O'Neill (snooker player)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Already BLPPRODed and moved to draft once. No sources, and the juniors snooker player turned businessperson (note there are several other notable Sean O'Neills) does not appear meet GNG.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 07:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - aside from being a non-cited BLP - they are not notable, especially as a snooker player. Article makes claims that player was a professional, but wasn't. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:55, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * article is also a C&P move of Draft:Sean O'Neill (snooker player) Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - as above. Probably self-promotion. Nigej (talk) 08:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. While the page in its current form skirts close to qualifying for a G11 speedy, the assertion that he won "major (amateur) junior tournaments domestically, regionally, and worldwide" might benefit from elaboration. If references could be found to prove this, and the tournaments did indeed prove to be "major", then this might demonstrate notability per WP:SPORTSPERSON (A sportsperson is presumed to be notable if the person has actively participated in a major amateur ... competition ... and so is likely to have received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.) However, even if notability could be claimed under this criterion, the page is such a blatant breach of WP:NOTLINKEDIN that it would probably still benefit from being nuked from space and started from scratch. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 13:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.