Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Terrington Wright


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:47, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Sean Terrington Wright

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completing nomination for an anonymous editor - their rationale was posted on the talk page of the article, and is included below verbatim. On the merits, I make no recommendation. I will say, though, that - for an artist with the length of career noted in this article (in both number of releases and the span of time) - there sure aren't many sources out there. I could see this being a keep if good and reliable sources (independent of the subject) came forward. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

This page should be deleted because Sean Terrington Wright is not notable. He is a self-publisher who is using this Wikipedia page to promote his material. There are no independent sources cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.142.249.81 (talk • contribs) 00:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment No assertion of notability as a visual artist - indeed after "artist" in the first line and "created over 1000 paintings" in line 2 no mention at all that I can see. Should be judged just on his musical career. International Heroes seems best claim to fame. May be sources also under "Rikki Wright" but there are squads of people with that name. Johnbod (talk) 14:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment A search of usual sources finds no independent citations. A couple of websites list him but one is his own and another a small artists club.  No links for musical career in the name of the article --DavidTTTaylor (talk) 15:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme (  talk  )  00:06, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No secondary refs to be found. No independent assertions of notability to be found. -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  01:37, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:AUTHOR and WP:BOOK and WP:NMUSIC. Qworty (talk) 06:14, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:AUTHOR, WP:MUSIC, WP:ANYBIO, and pretty much anything else you could toss at it. I almost wish we could somehow keep this as a cautionary tale for creative types on how simply tossing out a lot of material won't make anyone care.  Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:05, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.