Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Winchester


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 18:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Sean Winchester

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This information is no longer current or relevant. It should be deleted because it has not been confirmed or updated Stephaniaraquel (talk) 16:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 17.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 17:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:11, 17 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Being out-of-date is not a criteria for deletion. Seems notable as a drummer with two major acts, Everclear and Bow Wow Wow.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete not individually notable as a musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:35, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I've found some coverage - The Oakland Press praising his drumming, The Buffalo News also. Drumhead magazine has a brief profile here.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 12:27, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Was actually going to close as Speedy Keep as being oudate isn't a valid reason for deletion however the article is in such a shit state and to be totally honest it's better off deleted and rewritten, Notability doesn't look all that great either, If the creator wants to recreate this I suggest they use WP:DRAFT. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:36, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * It was actually the creator who nominated the article for deletion :) I agree the article is in poor state - it was hacked down because of a copyvio. I have attempted to clean it up a bit and add some references.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.