Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Search LOVE in Google


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete-- JForget 23:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Search LOVE in Google

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod removed without comment or improvements. Anti-war and human rights group without WP:RS or assertion of notability. Merely a campaign to have everyone search for the word "love" using Google on Jan. 1, 2009. Delete. Evb-wiki 11:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No assertion of significance. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 13:17, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Ignoring the "Google" in its name, is there anywhere in the article that even says what this organisation does, let alone assert notability? Speedy delete per WP:CSD. Resurgent insurgent (as admin) 13:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonnotable organization. NawlinWiki 14:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - this organization doesn't appear to meet any of Wikipedia's relevant inclusion standards. JavaTenor 16:08, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article doesn't assert notability, nor does it have any reliable sources, only their own website.  Useight 18:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete; No assertion of notability. Oh wait, someone already tagged it as a speedy but DGG declined the speedy (there's a surprise). Clearly a CSD A7. Masaruemoto 19:25, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - to be fair, DGG swap a prod tag for the speedy tag only after the author indicated that he intended to improve it. WP:AGF. --Evb-wiki 20:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unnotable group. • Lawrence Cohen  16:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment If nothing more is supplied, of course it cant be kept at AfD. Before coming to this page today, I deleted 15 articles that had been nominated for speedy or expired prods, and the day isn't over. I even picked out one or two newly prodded that should have been speedied, and deleted them. Yesterday I deleted 21.  My deletion log is public. The average per admin for articles is between 1 and 2--most do other things mainly. My choice is to delete junk articles, while saving those that are possible.  DGG (talk) 23:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. -- The Anome 14:43, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.