Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Searchmercials


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Searchmercials

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism, four hits on google, two of which are wikipedia. Tagishsimon (talk) 16:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I think this article (if deleted) can be included in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_advertising article. I have no reason to try to gain hits on Google as I have no websites of my own relating to this subject matter. http://darlenejanis.com is my website.  I trully believe that this term does implicidly describe this new trend. DJanis (talk) 13:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * And Avoid neologisms explains why it is a bad thing. --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I understand now what Neolodism is. Do you think it can be included in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_advertising article. I still trully believe that this term does implicidly describe this new trend and should be explained. DJanis (talk) 13:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as protologism; the first source in this article apparently invented this term on January 30, 2009.  Regrettably, the term "searchmercial" cannot be used even as part of the contents of another article, see NEOLOGISM.  If sources besides that original web page can be found discussing the idea of "video commercial[s] designed specifically for online search engines," and if those sources meet Wikipedia's reliability standards, then discussion of that subject could be included in Search_advertising, just not under the term "searchmercial".  Let us know if you have any more questions about Contributing to Wikipedia; we do appreciate your efforts to build Wikipedia with us.  Regards,  Baileypalblue (talk) 19:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: I can't link to the first source I mentioned because it's blocked by Wikipedia's spam filter, but you can find it by googling "Local Search & Online Video - Why SMBs Need a Video Searchmercial". Baileypalblue (talk) 19:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologisms must go. §FreeRangeFrog 19:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.