Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seasoned Players


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:53, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Seasoned Players

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

An unremarkable film series that fails WP:NFILM. Sufficient RS coverage not found. Industry awards do not count towards notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Sexuality and gender,  and Lists.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete No independent coverage.  D r e a m Focus  08:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Vaco98 (talk) 12:47, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent coverage to distinguish subject from run-of-the-mill. Nothing to support WP:NFILM notability. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I really didn't remember having created this cruft a lifetime ago. Burn with fire. Cavarrone 19:26, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks independent sources to establish notability. MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent sources found, lacks notability. Timetraveller80 (talk) 10:46, 26 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.