Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seattle luxury


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Seattle luxury
Delete - advertisement. Wickethewok 07:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP and WP:SPAM -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 07:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertisment, spam Gu 08:16, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per TBC. Henning Makholm 19:38, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:24, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Request Clarification or Undelete 12:03, 2 April 2006 - I only created the article as I saw under the term 'luxury_real_estate' the profile of a company I am aware of and felt this was on par with that article. I felt if that article was accepted,  this one could be.   Could someone at least clarify the difference between the two?  I accept and understand and don't want to add untasteful spam and it was not my intent,  but why is one company allowed and another not?   'Luxury Real Estate' was clearly written and corrected by the creator of the business "Luxury Real Estate" with an added definition of "luxury real estate" after placing their company information.    Also,  is there a way to restate anything in the article to make it valid?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johng7777 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per above. - After reviewing the spamming policy, I agree this article should be deleted.  I do feel that the article 'luxury real estate' should be reviewed carefully as well, as that is where the idea for this article was conceived.  I am aware that IBM or Hewlett Packard etc. are large enough for notoriety,  but I don't believe 'luxury real estate' would be in that classification as they are not setting any trends per se in the luxury real estate market, nor are they considered a standard by any means.  Just an opinion from a luxury realtor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johng7777 (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.