Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian 'Tianu' Burduja


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 09:41, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Sebastian 'Tianu' Burduja

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject fails WP:BIO. What we have for sources is as follows:


 * passing mention
 * a blurb from the subject's employer
 * something that doesn't mention the subject, likewise
 * a blog post
 * a puff piece/press release
 * a video created by the subject
 * an article written by the subject, likewise
 * an entry in a catalogue

I'm afraid none of these really passes the WP:RS and WP:SIGCOV threshold, and so we should delete. - Biruitorul Talk 22:58, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Do not deleteSeveral sources were added (in both English and Romanian). At least 7 different major media outlets profile this person's story. These are not quotes, but full interviews. The criteria for notability are met IMHO, given level of awareness among the Romanian public. Mpopleanu Talk
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 01:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - article does not demonstrate notability and does not provide reliable sources.--Rpclod (talk) 05:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. His opinion is cited by some news outlets, but he is only briefly described by them. In any event, we're not covering everyone who appears in the news. A lot in the article is exagerated, from his definition as a "public figure" to the "virality" of his opinion piece in "Adevărul".- Andrei (talk) 08:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Do not deleteExaggerations were corrected. The expression "public figure" still applies, in my humble opinion. He is not simply briefly described by the news articles listed; these are full profile stories. A simple Google search for "sebastian burduja" makes the case for inclusion. I think this is a valid addition to the encyclopedia.[User:Mpopleanu|Mpopleanu]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpopleanu (talk • contribs) 13:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)  — Mpopleanu (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete -- fails even WP:V. Bearian (talk) 14:26, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.