Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Winnett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 19:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Sebastian Winnett

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article was (improperly) PRODded with the reason "Subject is not noteworthy, page has been created as a joke as "Winnet" is a slang term for faecal adhesion." The person does appear to exist through a Google search, though. My reason for deletion is that I don't think this person is notable per the Wikipedia guideline of notability. Tinlinkin (talk) 18:20, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:27, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:27, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources don't show notability. Being exhibited on its own doesn't show notability. Searching only gives blogs and the like. Quantpole (talk) 22:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete but don't salt - this is a real 22-year-old artist, but who is just not yet notable. Bearian (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Might be notable one day, but not today. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even the "home" web site is a set of free pages via his ISP, and in the name of Tom Winnett not Sebastian Winnett.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:18, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.