Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SecondLife Neualtenburg

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. BLANKFAZE | (&#1095;&#1090;&#1086;??) 01:39, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

SecondLife Neualtenburg
Nothing but advertising. Title and text don't seem to have anything to do with each other. This is probably a copyvio, but I didn't want to list it there because I want a peremptory decision to delete so this doesn't get recreated. RickK 00:08, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Reads more like an editorial to me, and a highly granular one at that. --Calton | Talk 13:00, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obscure trivia of barely notable MMORPG. Marcika 04:55, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is actually my project and I'm stunned (and thrilled) to see it on Wikipedia. Just so you understand, this is not your normal MMORPG build.  This is an experiment in a sustainable virtual government which has it's own constitution.  We're currently moving on to the second phase and I'd love to rewrite the page to reflect the true depth of the project, post our novel constitution, and share some details on the governmental structure.  I feel it's not a vanity page rather a potential reference for a unique and notable virtual governmental experiment.  --Ulrika 08:51, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * I thought I'd add some more information. It appears that this description has been copied from the Second Life History wiki, a wiki created to record the development of the Second Life society.  When we created our government, we drew very heavily on Wikipedia for references, utilizing a Social Democracy for our Mixed_government which combines a Democracy, a Meritocracy, and an Ergatocracy.  Seats in our representative body are assigned using a Borda Count from scores generated from a unique ranked vote.  It's a natural for wikipedia given that wikipedia helped lay the foundation of the city. --Ulrika Fri Mar 25 16:34:00 GMT 2005
 * Edited out duplicate vote. RSpeer 17:29, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Regardless of whether it is an interesting social experiment, it is not content that belongs on Wikipedia, because it is original research. RSpeer 16:34, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.