Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Family

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:44, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Second Family
Retrieved from deleted as "neologism". Mikkalai 02:24, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Megan1967 07:18, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * All this is good, notability and stuff, but since the term is mentioned in the "First Lady" article, shouldn't this article redirect there, if you don't want its current content, rather than deleted? Mikkalai 08:03, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Is this term actually used anywhere? If not, redirect to discourage recreation - David Gerard 09:21, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. Radiant_* 13:17, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - neologism. SteveW 21:26, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Please comment on the usage if this term in the First Lady, article. Unexplained neologisms must not be used in articles that explain other things. In the political context it is IMO frivolous. Mikkalai 00:53, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Then the article should explain its meaning, imho. Radiant_* 07:25, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.