Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Glance (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. m.o.p 01:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Second Glance (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Film is not notable. Doesn't meet WP:MOVIE. Dkchana (talk) 21:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Because we are about consensus, which part of WP:MOVIE would you say it does not meet? What are some parts of WP:MOVIE that you would say it does meet? Invmog (talk) 23:42, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 19 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Certainly long enough, descriptive enough, contains much more than just plot, its few references back up the plot summary and notablity. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 17:57, 19 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep as WP:JNN is a poor deletion rationale, multiple reliable sources are available with due diligence, and nominator's well-meant nomination shows a misunderstanding of the applicable notability guidelines. Also, nom's recent spat of deletion prods and noms being toward Christian-related articles is MOST worrisome.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:59, 19 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep: It seems like a case of WP:Tag bombing to me. There are just so many Afds by this nominator, it is hard to count them. Time to stop. May well require a chat/warning from an admin, but not necessarily a block. History2007 (talk) 16:45, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Perhaps a or  ? Given that all of the nominations in question here are Christian films, it smells distinctly of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:43, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.