Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Life Liberation Army


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.-- Hús  ö  nd  04:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Second Life Liberation Army

 * — (View AfD)

Not notable enough to deserve own article - admits only ten members.


 * Delete --Qu e ntin Smith 18:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. thadius856talk 19:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete it's a stub with nothing that satisfies WP:V. Signpostmarv 20:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --JudahBlaze 21:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Entertaining, but just not notable enough.  AubreyEllenShomo 21:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not verifiable. JChap2007 00:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd suggest a move to SL History Wiki -- RoninBK E TC 01:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment -- Suggest hold for more research. Have found links, video footage, references from mainstream press e.g. New York Times, interviews, etc. Significant ramifications for future 3D worlds. 03:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC) User:ScholarScola
 * Response -- You found one link to a site which requires a log on. It is my understanding such links aren't usable as sources. The interview has a large focus on the content rendered in the article for deletion, so it doesn't really hold that much weight as a source. Signpostmarv 04:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * delete rubbish like like shld be confined to the article on the game or whatever it is, if that is even notable &rArr; bsnowball  10:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per the article: "The size of the SLLA movement is unknown but is suspected to be less than 10." Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  02:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment --Some recent commentary on opioniojuris.org regaring the legal implications of SL and liberation movements demonstrate why this is an important entry - no need to delete.--Slla 11:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * delete - per nom. --61.114.193.19 14:30, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.