Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secondary Objectives in Black (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 21:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Secondary Objectives in Black (video game)

 * — (View AfD)

Almost the entire article is based on speculation. Speculation cannot, by definition, be objective fact or encyclopedic. Bumm13 04:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note Multiple accounts who contributed to this AfD are suspected sockpuppets per Requests for checkuser/Case/Infomanager. ~ trialsanderrors 07:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, blatant WP:OR. BryanG(talk) 06:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Realkyhick 06:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. "This contains detailed speculative information..." Enough said. MER-C 07:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, even without the speculation, this would be a game guide. J I P  | Talk 10:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * OR-tacular! -- Kicking222 14:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- concur with nom. Article reads "This contains detailed speculative information regarding the possible background of the secondary objectives in BLACK. Please note that most of these items are purely speculative, and are based solely upon the displayed title of each objective as it is completed and discovered." which indicates it may not be useful information.
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 19:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a game-guide. Koweja 19:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:OR Alan Shatte 21:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all discussion above. Jessica Anne Stevens 22:25, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above (WP:OR, etc.).--Alan Au 05:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR and WP:NOT. It's a game guide that belongs on GameFAQs. --Scottie theNerd 06:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NOT, WP:OR Gisele Hsieh 20:24, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete It doesn't seem like concensus is going to change. Brad Guzman 20:31, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree with speedy delete per above Joel Jimenez 04:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree with speedy delete per above Joel Jimenez 04:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.