Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seconds Apart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 08:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Seconds Apart

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet GNG PenulisHantu (talk) 19:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep, not only does it meet WP:GNG, but it easily passes WP:NFILM as well. There is a Variety review cited in the article [], and there is a link to Rotten Tomatoes which has Critical reviews listed [|1] and [|2]. Also found a review at CineMagazine [|3].  Was a WP:BEFORE done before nominating? Donaldd23 (talk) 20:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Donaldd23. The film meets WP:NFILM with the reviews from Variety and The Times-Picayune | The New Orleans Advocate (Nola.com), which are both reliable sources. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 00:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:NFILM per reviews in reliable news websites and magazines. Rickshaw Takahashi (talk) 16:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes GNG and WP:NFILM. I've even added a few sources. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of sources that would establish NFILM. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, it meets WP:NFILM, no matter that I don't find its story interesting. Alex-h (talk) 08:12, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. While I'll grant that a couple of the sources already in the article are less than ideal, they aren't all terrible and other commenters have demonstrated that other good sourcing exists to improve this with. Bearcat (talk) 16:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.