Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secrecy (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. Calabe1992 03:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Secrecy (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Only source is from Random House (the publisher). No other statements of notability. Calabe1992 21:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator. Calabe1992 21:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep—Non-trivial review and  and probably more if I keep looking.  For what it's worth I've found that most novels by authors from notable publishing houses get enough reviews somewhere that the're near impossible to prove non-notable.  Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 23:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Belva Plain is a best-selling, major American author. It may be difficult to argue that one of her novels is nonnotable. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 01:00, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Has independent coverage, per links above/in article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - In addition to the above, I'll also note that it has appeared on the NY Times bestseller list in hardcover, and paperback editions. -- Whpq (talk) 19:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per Kirkus and PublishersWeekly reviews cited. Lady  of  Shalott  02:51, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.