Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret Cinema (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 01:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Secret Cinema (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This company is not noteworthy enough. Article appears to be only updated as self-promotion. The movies referenced are effectively screenings and their directors are not involved in these screenings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pingu7931 (talk • contribs) 04:04, 2 March 2015
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 4 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak delete - The original author was focussed entirely on this company and its sister enterprises, probably with a WP:COI. Most of the promotional material from earlier versions has gone, but so has nearly all of the detail about their botched "Back to the Future" screening last year which (in my recollection of events) is where their notability lies. What's left is little more than a list of films. Bazj (talk) 10:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Unlike most AFD articles, I've actually heard of this company, though it's involvement in at least two events - the "Back to the Future" screening which was cancelled last year, and now the fact that they are about the screen "The Empire Strikes Back". It seems as though the furore around "Back to the Future" has now raised the profile of the company's events enough that it will now be regularly covered in genre new sources.  This brings us out of WP:EVENT territory, and implies that the company is notable in its own right. Bluap (talk) 14:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Actual name:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:46, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep - I have edited the page and not working for them so not self-promotion. You could say the Wikipedia page about Wikipedia is self-promotion. It gained more knowledge by using Back to the Future last year though. Needs more work on controversies as were other problems than just BTTF. Charlr6 (talk) 19:35, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 01:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.