Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret Pickle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. causa sui (talk) 21:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC) 
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. causa sui (talk) 21:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Secret Pickle

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article has an obvious wp:coi problem. I am not sure how the supper club is notable. It does not claim to be the first such organization but makes vague and unverified peacock claims including "one of the top" and "along with a handful of others". The external links are local reviews of the restaurant - some of which do not appear to be independent. Reviews by themselves do not make for notability. Porturology (talk) 04:39, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I did a search and the results I found are considered trivial sources at best. I found nothing that establishes the notability of this club. There's nothing to show that this is any more or any less notable than the thousands of other similar clubs throughout the world. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:50, 19 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:07, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:07, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lacks significant coverage to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 18:20, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking significant coverage in multiple independent third party sources. Feel free to ping my talk page if these are added to the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:43, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.