Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secretary-General of the Singapore PAP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge with the respective articles on the party. Note that parts of the PAP Secretary-General article seem to be copied directly from the PAP website and probably constitute a copyvio for that reason. Those parts will not be merged. Sjakkalle (Check!)  17:41, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Secretary-General of the Singapore PAP

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Redundant content fork as its subject scope is covered under the political party's article. I have not seen any other political parties with such an article as well. Lionratz (talk) 10:04, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following article for deletion because it is a similar content fork:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

The following article should be considered together with the two mentioned above:

— SMUconlaw (talk) 16:18, 25 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge the new articles with the existing articles about the political parties. Also, the creator should provide references for the information in the articles. He or she hasn't provided any references for the names and periods of service of the officeholders of either party. — SMUconlaw (talk) 16:15, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 03:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: Relisting for a third time because we are dealing with several articles in this discussion.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:36, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge the new articles as sections within the existing parties' articles.Baldy Bill (talk) 23:22, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.