Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secretlab


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not convinced by what is presented here that the article currently qualifies at this time under WP:NCORP. Missvain (talk) 23:47, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Secretlab

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a product catalog, not a WP article. The references areto the multiple product announcemenets.  DGG ( talk ) 01:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not much of a product brochure, but it's definitely just an advertisement, and all 90(!) references are, in fact, just product announcements and press releases. AdoTang (talk) 15:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 27 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep The topic meets WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Prior to voting here, I spent  quite some time clearing the promotional lines added by several other editors . As it stands now, the page look neutral and factual  in line with WP:NPOV. It's no longer looking like "Product catalog" as  evisaged by the nominator.
 * Furthermore, I reviewed all the sources cited. I removed quite a lump that failed WP:RS. Majority of the remaining references are very good sources and they meet the demands of WP:RS.
 * Also, a search of "Secretlab" in Goodnews turned out lots of sources  as given below:


 * https://www.google.com/search?q=Secretlab&newwindow=1&sxsrf=ALeKk03Lel82fqVsD2xoniStY9Kn19TT_g:1622545473342&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjDw8f0pPbwAhUUP-wKHXXjAHAQ_AUoA3oECAIQBQ
 * This shows clearly that the topic meets the  notability standards as enshrined in WP:CORP,  WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG.Irasa Nira Yaa (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete as advertising. Even after the cleanup, this still reads like an advertisement and honestly seems borderline G11 to me. References to product reviews do not necessarily count towards notability IMO, as sometimes media outlets are given samples or paid by companies to review their products so this weakens the necessary source independence. Aspening (talk) 14:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.