Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secricom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Fram (talk) 12:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Secricom

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This program has 32 Google hits, 0 Google News hits, 0 Google Books hits and 0 Google scholar hits. Deprodded by with the comment that most "Seventh Framework projects are notable." Well, this one is not. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 06:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N. Masterpiece2000   ( talk ) 08:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; doesn't even seem to have any hits on Google blog search. That's pretty bad. --/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 08:50, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.   --  brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 15:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.   --  brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 15:39, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Removed unsourced and Merge/Redirect to Seventh Framework Programme. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 17:26, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * That's like redirecting some scientist's project to the National Science Foundation. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 18:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The way I understood it was that the Seventh Framework Programme orginazation was directly involved in the creation of Secricom (I do love your userpage, however). -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 18:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, thanks. I just worry that this Secricom amounts to a nameplate on some professor's door. As the deprodder mentioned, many of these projects are notable; as can be discovered by a Google News search, some are making waves. As for being "involved in the creation", I visualize a committee with a lot of money to spread around. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 18:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.