Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sectarianism in Gilgit, Baltistan

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 08:18, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Sectarianism in Gilgit, Baltistan
Previously speedied, but recreated by the user again. Wanted to get a second opinion on whether any content can be placed in another article, and whether this should be deleted. Thanks for your help! HappyCamper 03:35, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOR  Wikibofh 03:45, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * The page consists entirely of arguments, polemics, and opinion. Where there are facts mentioned they are used as support and are incidental to the purpose of advancing the author's POV, and in any case are not supported by any references. The overall tone does not appear to have ever been intended to be encyclopedic. I do not see how anything could be salvaged from the article as it stands. If there is a topic here deserving of an article, I strongly suspect it would be easier for a subject matter expert to write it from scratch than to use this text as a starting point. Delete --DavidConrad 04:21, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Kept if verifiable and if can be rewritten to neutral pov — Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Machtzu (talk • contribs) 05:22, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research. --DrTorstenHenning 07:50, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per DavidConrad. KissL 09:20, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete essay in first person. All statements unsourced. WP:NOR. What would be next? Sectarianism in San Fransisco, California? Anything that's verified and referenced can go into: Sectarianism. No need for granular detail. - Mgm|(talk) 09:38, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy POV Manik Raina 09:41, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or Speedy. Neither a real encyclopedia article or even an honest attempt at one. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  11:16, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV DV8 2XL 11:21, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy, rant. the wub  "?/!"  15:02, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete – this is not the place for essays. And besides, it should be Gilgit, not Gilgit, Balistan. Pakistan city names do not follow the US convention, and as far as my knowledge goes, there's only one Gilgit. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  17:07, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * delete rant. Sabine's Sunbird 01:39, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.