Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secularism in Iraq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. Even the lone keep !voter acknowledges the need for a complete re-write, and, conversely, two of the two delete !voters suggest the development of a legitimate article with this title is possible (and the other two, while they make no specific comment on the question, take issue with the current content of the article, rather than with the notability of this subject, or with the suitability of the subject for a Wikipedia article. All of this adds up to a consensus to draftify.. Steve Smith (talk) 00:55, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Secularism in Iraq

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reads like the editor's personal opinions, fails WP:NOTESSAY. PROD for same reason removed by page creator without comment. RA 0808 talkcontribs 20:38, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  RA 0808  talkcontribs 20:38, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions.  RA 0808  talkcontribs 20:38, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Unencyclopedic and fueled strictly by personal opinion. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  22:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep but rewrite per above. This is noteworthy topic with a complex history for which an article is deserved. Charles Essie (talk) 19:53, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete current article as it is appears to be personal opinion and we shouldn't keep it around hoping someone will fix it. No opposition to a new article on the topic that is encyclopedic and referenced to appropriate sources. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 17:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete or draftify. Anything that starts with, There seem to be is pretty much not an encyclopedia article by definition.  On the other hand, this, ahem, seems like an interesting topic, and with work, might end up being a useful article.  I'd be happy to see this moved to draft space for somebody to develop further.  -- RoySmith (talk) 00:28, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.