Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000  ( talk,  contribs ) 21:35, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely fails WP:CORP notability standard, and the article only serves as a virtual website for the organization. Brianhe (talk) 10:03, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Brianhe (talk) 10:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Brianhe (talk) 20:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Please note that this is a national statutary financial regulator rather than what is normally described as a corporation. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 13:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * not sure - it's a statutory regulatory authority, so it's not clear WP:CORP is the appropriate standard. It's the sort of thing that should be notable. The corresponding ar:wp article is about the same. But we do need actual sources, else it'll need redirection somewhere appropriate - David Gerard (talk) 13:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added references to a couple of the many independent reliable sources found by searching without the "(SCA)". This is the UAE's equivalent of the Securities and Exchange Commission, so exactly the kind of topic that any half-way decent encyclopedia would be expected to cover. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 18:22, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per article improvements / new sources to confirm notability. This is an acceptable stub at this point. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:35, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per article improvements / new sources to confirm notability. This is an acceptable stub at this point. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:35, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.