Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Security Check Children (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirect, clear consensus that an independent page should not continue and cannot see anything relevant to merge but does seem to be a valid redirect. Davewild (talk) 15:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Security Check Children
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

After searching in multiple database archives I could not find real significant discussion of this article's subject matter in independent WP:RS/WP:V secondary sources. I thought it possible that a prod could be contested so I am bringing this to AfD for a discussion about it. There is some related material at List of Scientology Security Checks, but I do not think a merge is needed and in any case discussion in this forum will solicit further commentary about what to do with this page. If anyone does know of significant discussion of this subject matter in independent secondary sources, feel free to mention them or just add it to the article. Cirt (talk) 05:18, 13 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge anything useful not already included in the List of Scientology Security Checks page, delete the rest. Ironholds 06:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge Ironholds said it best (and first!) --Ecoleetage (talk) 07:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I created the article and even I suggest merge and redirect - David Gerard (talk) 09:06, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of Scientology Security Checks, as suggested above. The article doesn't assert enough notability to warrant a stand-alone article. --  JediLofty User ¦ Talk 10:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect - I've changed my mind... looking at the List of Scientology Security Checks article it seems there is nothing to merge, as all the pertinent information is already in that article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JediLofty (talk • contribs)
 * Delete due to lack of 3rd party sources.  --Rob (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete ĤéĺĺвοЎ (talk) 07:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: This is not a poll. Please let us know your reason for the strong delete. DigitalC (talk) 00:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.