Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Security Forums Dot Com

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!)  28 June 2005 11:43 (UTC)

Security Forums Dot Com
The owners of the website would like the article deleted as they don't want to seem as if they are spamming Wikipedia. Just following their wishes. Evil Monkey&#8756;Hello 04:30, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable enough and does not appear at all spam-like. Alphax &tau;&epsilon;&chi; 04:35, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Since I'm currently surfing anon on a friend's computer and can't be bothered to log in, I'll make an observation: if they're notable, it's not spam, and they deserve an article. It looks pretty well written anyway. What's the Alexa rating... hmm...
 * 273,567, from . Alphax &tau;&epsilon;&chi; 04:50, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article is not vanity, because it is a very notable forum of its category (IT). The article cannot be advertising, as SFDC is not a paid or an ad-laden site. -- Znode 04:38, 2005 Jun 19 (UTC)
 * If this is notable, then http://www.devnetwork.net/ definitely is (#1 google hit for PHP forum). Advertising doesn't have to be driven by monetary purposes. Ambush Commander 05:13, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Verifiable, notable, NPOV. (What's all this about devnetwork.net?) func (talk) 06:26, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Clean up and keep: It is a wee bit rah-rah and advertising copy, but the site qualifies as notable.  The prose should be NPOV'd. Geogre 13:05, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertisement drini &#9742; 21:15, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.